Showing posts with label Atrios. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atrios. Show all posts

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Rules for Thee and Not for Me

There's a particular irony to Poynter having posted this the day after the story broke about The Washington Post's plans for paid "salons" and access to newsroom people.


FTC to Investigate Bloggers Receiving Pay for Posts

The common practice of posting a graphical ad or a link to an online retailer -- and getting commissions for any sales from it -- would be enough to trigger oversight.


Well, hell's bells.

Obviously, if you're on this page, you can see that I, like many others with blogs, run ads, albeit thoroughly unremunerative ones. They are clearly ads.

I don't and would never write a pay-for-post item meant to look like news or commentary, or tout something in an item for money. Those kind of postings should get some scrutiny, in my opinion. If you're representing something as legitimate reporting or commentary, people ought to know that you're not being paid to shade the truth.

But I am at a loss to understand why a clearly identified ad on a blog is somehow suspect and worthy of FTC notice when ads in print are not.

If you've knocked around newspapers, especially smaller ones, long enough, you've probably been drafted at one time or another to write a "story" that was fed into an advertising section.

Duncan Black, AKA Atrios, often mockingly mentions the need for a blogger ethics panel because of what he sees as a double standard that is applied to blogs and not the mainstream media. I don't agree 100 percent of the time with him, but frequently do. And this seems to be another example of rules for one kind of reporting and commentary and not another. What difference, for example, is there between a book review to be found on a blog somewhere and that of a newspaper's website that would warrant an FTC investigation? It's possible the stand-alone blogger violated some disclosure rules, and certainly most newspapers have some rules about not accepting gifts or not writing reviews of books by friends (or enemies) but lapses happen.

(For the record, I write some reviews for a newspaper website for which I am not paid, though I am able to keep the books, which are filling my bookshelves.)

It's actually pretty creepy if the FTC truly intends to do what the story says.

Amusingly enough, this ad popped up on my blogger.com page as I was preparing to post this.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Accuracy Fight

Joe Klein, Time magazine and his editors are taking a beating over his writings about FISA. This is about as big a battle as I've seen over a reporter's accuracy.

Atrios gets to the heart of the matter.


Major newspaper has big megaphone. Readers generally have no megaphone. Journalists have responsibilities and these ethics I keep hearing about, including the responsibility not to be as factfree as they keep claiming blogs are. When you explain, calmly and repeatedly, that 2+2=4 and they keep denying it you get a little mad. Civil behavior isn't about restraining from using insults or obscenities, it's about behaving like a fucking decent human being.

Here

and here

and here


Monday, August 6, 2007

Inquiring Minds Should Want to Know

In discussing Glenn Greenwald's piece on FISA law changes, Dr. Duncan Black, aka Atrios, asks this perfectably reasonable, non-partisan question:

Have the phone and email conversations of any American journalists, US federal officeholders, or federal campaign workers ever been intercepted without a warrant?

Lijit Ad Tag