From editorsweblog
Due to their restructuring earlier this month, the Toronto Star has cut 78 editing jobs, reports Bloomberg. The 117 year-old paper has just announced that it is outsourcing all of its copy editing to Pagemasters North America, a provider of editorial services owned by The Canadian Press. The switch will save the paper C$4000 000 annually.
Showing posts with label Toronto Star. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toronto Star. Show all posts
Thursday, November 26, 2009
It Isn't Going to Stop
Another 78 go out the door.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Revenge of the Copy Editor
A copyeditor at the Toronto Star greeted the news that union copyeditor jobs were being eliminated in favor of freelancers by heavily editing the publisher's memo announcing same, pointing out all the ways in which the publisher could benefit from editorial aid.
Monday, June 22, 2009
Pointing Fingers
I have to say that if one third of errors in this paper were committed by editors, something's wrong. I can't dispute this editor's figures; she seems to have researched them pretty thoroughly. But am surprised to see that she thinks her paper's reporters 'fess up quickly.
It has been my experience, at at least two newspapers, that assigning desk editors tend to point the finger at the copy desk all day until those editors come in, do the research and establish that the originating editors or reporters were responsible. It's not clear to me if she's distinguishing between copy and other editors.
I do think that a policy ought to be consistent--either you blame the individual, always, by title, or you never blame anyone. That may seem unfair in any given instance but it does reduce the finger pointing and fights over who did what.
Speaking of errors:
Some Mistakes Are More Entertaining Than Others.
Yes, they are.
It has been my experience, at at least two newspapers, that assigning desk editors tend to point the finger at the copy desk all day until those editors come in, do the research and establish that the originating editors or reporters were responsible. It's not clear to me if she's distinguishing between copy and other editors.
I do think that a policy ought to be consistent--either you blame the individual, always, by title, or you never blame anyone. That may seem unfair in any given instance but it does reduce the finger pointing and fights over who did what.
Speaking of errors:
Some Mistakes Are More Entertaining Than Others.
Yes, they are.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
